The NZ Cup is purely about about finding the best horse in the land. The ultimate race. If that horse happens to be a previous winner of the race so be it. I don't see why they should be punished for being the best.
1. You can't win off 20m. The times they go now show that. The trail horse is capable of going 3.58(?) What do you have to do off 20m and loop the field at the same time?
2. The second line is bad enough, 10m is even worse and certainly not like the second line. The second line gives you a touch of hope setting midfield. 10m you see a wall.
3. I am not a super fan of the All Stars winning all the time but they usually have the best horse so they win. That is fair.
4. Do you really want to see an inferior horse win because they got the best run and others were handicapped out of it with impossible runs.
5. Punters will always bet on the NZ Cup.
6. The lead up races are handicapped I think. That gives the slightly second tier horses their chance to pick up a decent cheque.
7. More conflict of interests with Dunn being part of ATC and training Sundees. What will mark will Spankem be off?
8. If you want to even it up, have a PBD standing start. Mind you, if you start from 5-10 on the front line you have the best draw because starts are mess these days.
This also shows the poor organisation of harness racing. HRNZ give a directive and Addington can oppose it? Surely, they don't have a choice. God, if clubs can oppose HRNZ rulings then bring back Waimate and Forbury!!