Jump to content
The Race Place

Racing Bill select committee report


Recommended Posts

A lot of reading

I note a couple of things

This would potentially save Avondale, the Order in Council being referred to is the transfer of assets to NZTR

26A Minister must not recommend order under section 25 if special
circumstances exist 20
If, having considered the matters in section 26(3), the Minister considers that
special circumstances exist regarding the use or potential use of the surplus
venue by the community in which the surplus venue is located, the Minister
must not recommend the making of an order under section 25.

If 2 clubs merge, then assets can be retained

23 Transfer of assets if racing clubs combine
(1) This section applies if 2 or more racing clubs propose to combine to form 1
club. 15
(2) The assets of any club that proposes to dissolve as a result of that combination
may, with the approval of the racing code with which it is registered, be transferred
to the club with which it proposes to combine.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see this working out for NZ racing. What happens with assets should be the clubs decision. If things end up being done involuntarily (no matter what the legislation is trying to do, and new steps to supposedly improve the 'just' process), it will alienate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mardigras said:

I don't see this working out for NZ racing. What happens with assets should be the clubs decision. If things end up being done involuntarily (no matter what the legislation is trying to do, and new steps to supposedly improve the 'just' process), it will alienate.

It has already alienated, just from the idea that they would even consider such a thing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the point in the whole land grab  part of the legislation

If the Bill is passed into law in it's current form then the asset that would generate the most money, more than all the rest put together, Avondale, would invoke clause 26A, and if that does not work, they have 20 days to lodge with the Supreme Court

Disappointing that all 3 Auckland  clubs do not merge and build a new state of the art mega racing complex, with a Strathyr track

I note Shatin had 500mm of rain in 30 hours yet still raced

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hesi said:

Disappointing that all 3 Auckland  clubs do not merge and build a new state of the art mega racing complex, with a Strathyr track

That's a nice idea I agree, but where is the revenue going to come from to maintain it and fund the racing on it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it's  the same as when you are trying to build any new business, you pour a lot of money into facilities, quality track, marketing(that thing that is foreign to NZ racing) , stakemoney, greater utilisation of your infrastructure, your product in general

Build up the income streams, it's not as though such a venture would be cash poor

Ellerslie have sort of done it, but the land is in the middle of the city and has become so valuable now

Restart again down towards Karaka

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael Guerin: Analysing one of the most important documents in New Zealand racing's history

13 Jun, 2020 6:00am
 6 minutes to read
NZ Herald
By: Michael Guerin


The codes and clubs of New Zealand racing could be handed more power by huge changes to what will be one of the most important documents in the history of the sport.

And that could provide a lifeline to embattled clubs like Avondale while also providing the codes with more input into how their races are promoted to the public, including its under-siege broadcasting arm.

The Racing Industry Bill is on target to be passed before the election, which will be of great relief to racing administrators as they seek to get their house in order.


The Bill has been through the select committee process and will now return to Parliament for its second and third readings and looks certain to pass, meaning racing will be governed by new laws in coming months after some painstaking work by the Racing Industry Transition Agency (RITA).

The Bill includes wordy, technical clauses on issues most racing followers won't care about, things like the formation of TAB NZ to take over from RITA, how offshore betting charges will be collected, and the powers of the Racing Integrity Board.

But the select committee, who had over 900 submissions on the Bill, did make significant changes to the original document and with all racing administrators realising the need for it to be passed before the September election, there isn't a lot of time to seek more amendments.


One of the major changes by the select committee will make it harder for the Minister for Racing and/or the codes to deem a venue surplus to needs, and therefore that venue can be transferred to the code, basically closing racetracks and taking them over.

While that could cover any racing venue in the country, when most people in New Zealand racing, and most definitely northern thoroughbred racing, think of that potential law they think Avondale.

The West Auckland club is sitting on one of the more valuable pieces of land owned by a racing club that could be in for the chop. They were given no dates for next season and effectively been told there won't be racing at their track again.


The original Bill would have made it easier for a track like Avondale to be shut, taken over by the industry and potentially sold for the industry's benefit.

But the select committee stated granting the Minister for Racing the ultimate power to make that decision "could unjustly result in a club surrendering its venue to the code."


The Minister for Racing will, if the new version of the Bill is passed, have to place greater weight on factors like how the transferring of any club's assets would effect that club's local community, including what not for profit purposes a track may be used for.

The latest version of the Bill also states clubs whose venues are under threat have the right to an independent reviewer and as a last resort can appeal to the High Court.

What does that all mean? It means it is going to be a lot harder for the codes to get their hands on venues like Avondale and, if they want to, sell them.

Whether racing people like that or not, if it becomes law Avondale will have avenues available to them that looked closed just weeks ago.

Avondale race course. Photo / Paul EstcourtAvondale race course. Photo / Paul Estcourt

Another key change to the original bill relates to the ownership of racing's intellectual property (IP), which was originally going to handed over to TAB NZ.

That would have given them total control over all race fields, vision and audio of New Zealand racing, to use how they see fit.

The select committee has instead recommended this be a commercial matter to be negotiated between the codes and the TAB, so they now have to actually discuss how New Zealand racing's IP is used, rather than just hand it over to the soon to be formed TAB NZ.

The codes look certain to raise their concerns over the TAB's already implemented step away from promoting domestic racing which they decree is now the sole responsibility of the codes.

While that may be TAB NZ's plan, they also control the industry's only broadcasting arm in Trackside television, which is set to have enormously reduced local coverage in the new season with few days even allocated on-track presenters.

That means Australian metropolitan thoroughbred racing is scheduled to get more coverage, colour and engagement than New Zealand racing apart from 20 days a year. Put simply, New Zealand punters will get vastly superior coverage of foreign racing than local racing.

That deeply irks racing code bosses and could have a disastrous long-term effect on not only domestic turnover but risks making New Zealand racing unpalatable to casual viewers let alone potential owners.

If the new Bill forces TAB NZ and the codes to negotiate over how their IP is used it may come with the caveat New Zealand racing is not turned into an inferior television product. The codes will want racing promoted, not just screened.

Under the proposed Bill the codes and clubs had a lot less power. After the select committee changes, the future of racing looks more balanced.

*** The man who has helped navigate New Zealand racing to its new era is adamant he won't be in charge heading forward.

Dean McKenzie is the executive chair of RITA and has overseen the new racing bill as well as drastic and much-needed cuts to the industry's expenses.

He and many of the RITA board could stay on when that organisation becomes TAB NZ probably in August but McKenzie says he will not be the chief executive of the TAB NZ.

"I haven't applied and won't be applying to move to the chief executive role of the new TAB NZ," McKenzie told the Herald.

"We are looking for a new chief executive but that process has been slowed by Covid-19 restriction but it is a priority for the business."

The Herald understands several of those on a potential shortlist for the chief executive role, one of the most crucial appointments in the history of the industry, are based overseas so have not yet been able to come to New Zealand for the next phase of interviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...